| By Andrew Wagner OnMilwaukee.com Staff Writer Photography by Allen Fredrickson E-mail author More articles by Andrew Wagner |
| Published March 7, 2008 at 5:20 a.m. |
|
Nobody will ever confuse Ted Thompson with an emotional, sentimental figure.
The Packers general manager is a man of few words and gives an impression of indifference. It's a tough-guy mentality that served him well during his 10-year career as a linebacker with the Houston Oilers.
In Green Bay, however, that attitude doesn't sit well with Packers fans who think he played a big role in the recent retirement of Brett Favre. It had been suggested that Favre felt offended that management didn't make a more conscious effort to let him know he was wanted.
Both Favre and Thompson tried to silence the conspiracy theorists in public comments, but the debate rages on and probably will for years to come.
Thompson denied that it was indifference on his part that caused Favre to think he wasn't wanted back for the 2008 season. He said that he felt confident that he and coach Mike McCarthy did all they could to make Favre feel like he was an important part of the team.
Following the loss to the New York Giants in the NFC Championship game on Jan. 20, Thompson let McCarthy handle most of the regular contact with Favre and kept to a distance. It was the same philosophy he followed last season.
"[Head coach] Mike [McCarthy] kind of stayed in constant contact, and I would make sure I stayed in touch from time to time," Thompson said. "We felt like, in each of those years it was important for Brett to make this decision for Brett, not to be badgered. He doesn't want to be talked into doing something one way or the other.
"He wants to know ... 'Can I still play and do you want me?' Yes and yes. After that he has to make the decision beyond that. But we felt like the communication lines were open, and we felt like we gave him enough space to be able to make the right decision for him."
In his farewell press conference on Thursday, Favre confirmed Thompson's view on the matter. He said the decision to retire was one he reached on his own as a result of the mental and physical strain put on him by the demands of the game.
"I know there's been comments and issues in the press lately about why I'm leaving, whether or not the Packers did enough, whether or not Ted and Mike tried to convince me to stay," Favre said. "None of those things have anything to do with me retiring, and that's from the heart."
From Thompson's first day on the job, the question of Favre's future was a constant question. Prior to the 2005 campaign, when the Packers went 4-12 and Favre had the worst statistical season of his career, Thompson was brought in to take over the GM duties from Mike Sherman, who stayed on as coach.
One of Thompson's first moves that winter was to relieve Sherman of his coaching duties. That was the start of what many considered to be a standoff between the quarterback and GM.
It took 113 days for Favre to make his decision. When it was official, the Packers issued a one-sentence press release from Thompson: "The Green Bay Packers are very pleased that Brett has come to this decision, and look forward to a successful 2006 season."Last season, Favre's emotional interview with NBC's Andrea Kremer following the season finale led many to believe they'd seen the last of No. 4. He announced his return on Feb. 2 and silenced critics with a season reminiscent of his MVP years, which made his retirement -- after a 13-3 season -- all the more surprising.
Fans and pundits alike have said that it was Thompson's lack of interest in signing free agent receiver Randy Moss that put the nail in the coffin of Favre's career. Thompson, during his time with both the Packers and Seattle Seahawks has been to build teams through the draft as opposed to making big splashes in the free agent market.
The Moss situation first came up a year ago when Favre said he was upset about the Packers not signing the oft-troubled wideout. Media reports at the time claimed that Favre had his agent, James "Bus" Cook, call the Packers to request a trade.
Favre later denied the claim.
"I was frustrated a couple weeks back when Randy Moss was traded to New England," Favre said at the time. "I never wanted to be traded and I don't want to be traded. I want to be in Green Bay. I want to finish my career as a Packer."
Speculation of a Thompson-Favre rift intensified when the announcement of Favre's retirement came quickly after Moss, a free agent again this year, opted to re-sign with New England. At a press conference to announce Favre's decision on Tuesday, Thompson denied that Favre was upset about the team's personnel moves.
"It was never brought up in any of my conversations with Brett and I don't think with [head coach] Mike [McCarthy] either this year," Thompson said. "He likes this team, he respects this team. He was a very good teammate to some people that were half his age or close to it. And that's not an easy thing to do. I can't explain all the things that you're getting at there, but Brett is a good teammate and he likes this team and I think he appreciates this team."
In interviews, Favre's agent, James "Bus" Cook, said that his client wanted to come back for another season but felt unappreciated and was disappointed that the team didn't make a push to sign Moss. Tuesday morning, ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported that the Packers' inaction in regards to Moss played a major role in his decision.
In a voicemail left later in the day with Mortensen, Favre said the opposite. He also addressed his relationship with the head coach and general manager.
"This is not about the Packers and who they got or who they didn't get," Favre said in the message. "I get along fine with [Thompson] and I get along great with [McCarthy. Do I agree with them all the time? No. But the bottom line is [that] none of that stuff affected my decision."
Favre and Thompson were rarely photographed together. Past announcements regarding Favre's return and retirement were frequently separate affairs.
Both deny any sort of rift, so the curious will have to take their words for what they're worth. The real truth may never be known.
|
6 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by milwacko on March 8, 2008 at 7:12 a.m. (report)
My point is that, on its face, the article was a joke. So you say Bus Cook and Favre's brother had evidence that Ted T didn't want Favre back? Really? Where are the quotes? If you're going to write an article suggesting that "some people" think this, get some quotes. Get somebody to go on the record saying that this is a concern. Andrew didn't. He DID get a whole bunch of people to say that it wasn't an issue.
| Rate this: |
Posted by Myke on March 7, 2008 at 7:21 p.m. (report)
In addition to the good points this article makes,I have always felt from the start of his tenture Ted T.has showed by his actions he was not in favor of Favre hanging around.His 1st action was to allow 1/2 the first class O-line the Pack had at the time get away.Next even though at the time the Pack had many more pressing needs he spent his 1ST draft choice on a quaterback! I would have liked to see someone to have the guts at the Press conference to ask Brett point blank if the Pack aquired Moss would that have affected his decision? Bus Cook( who is much closer to Brett than Teddy T.) says absolutely.Why did not anyone ask him about Bus Cook & his brothers remarks?Do I think the Ted T. is the sole reason he retired? No it's much more complicated than that.I do believe it factored in & Ted T. is secrtely happy & is not dumb enough to let anyone know he would just as soon the beloved Favre stepped aside,& he can get on with his guy.Read Bob McGinn journal articles on this. I swear he's a secret spokesman for Ted T.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on March 7, 2008 at 4:11 p.m. (report)
I cannot honestly believe that a 38 year old mature man would base his decision to come back to play on ONE other person (Thompson) and that he didn't kiss his butt enough. No way. Favre plays because he LOVES the game, not because Thompson kissed his butt enough or not enuogh. Of ALL players in the NFL, Brett plays because he loves and respects the game. He teammates are the ones who want him back, that should be "want" enough. Who cares what the GM says, what do his teammates say and what does his family say? That to me is far more important. Favre brought success to be Green Bay and to the players he played with. Thompson knows that with Favre they have a good chance to win and actually to sign some decent players who want to play with Favre. Thompson would be FOOLISH to think that Aaron Rodgers will get more and better talent to Green Bay. It's obvious Favre enjoyed his teammates, his fans, the city of Green Bay, and had a solid relationship with McCarthy...who cares about what the damn GM thinks?
| Rate this: |
Posted by LegallyBlonde on March 7, 2008 at 12:58 p.m. (report)
Previous talk-backers, The rift comes from Favre's brother and his agent, both of whom expressed concern that Favre didn't appear to be "wanted" back. I think they are pretty legitimate sources, however, I do believe that Brett made the decision for himself, and knew very well that he was welcome back.
| Rate this: |
Posted by theeditoriali on March 7, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. (report)
Have to agree with the previous comment. Why bother with this? To fill space? Brett spoke to this issue at length during his press conference. How about we accept him at his word? And move on.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |