| By Andy Tarnoff Publisher E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Andy Tarnoff |
| Published March 16, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. |
|
I'll admit it, I'm perhaps not as tuned in as I should be into the race for Wisconsin Supreme Court judge.
I'll also admit that until I started seeing these vague and confusing commercials lately, I didn't even know a race was underway.
In fact, I had to figure it out myself, since these commercials mention neither the race at hand, when the election is, or who they'd like me to vote for. They just tell me why some judge I've never heard of is soft on crime, peppering in some bobbling heads, grainy, stock footage of criminals and prisons and testimonials from organizations I've never heard of.
Then they tell me to call some number in the 608 or 715 or area code and tell this judge I've had enough.
Um, why are you telling me to do this?
Surely, you don't really want me to call these judges. I've gathered that these are third-party negative ads indirectly pitching a candidate for an upcoming April election (again, no date is shown, but I'm sure I'll figure it out). Apparently the candidates, whose names I don't recall, are soft on crime and let criminals go free.
Maybe I'm being naïve, but isn't it the job of state judges to enforce laws, not to enact them? I know there's room for interpretation, as is the case at the U.S. Supreme Court, but is it that highly partisan at the state level? If it is, do I even have the knowledge at my fingertips to make an educated decision about who to vote for? More importantly, should this really be up to me, or should the Wisconsin Supreme Court justices be appointed by an elected official?
Maybe if I saw some commercials with a few salient points from the candidates (whoever they are) on why they're great judges, I'd feel more comfortable voting next month. I highly doubt these guys are really setting rapists free, nor are they "keystone kops" they're portrayed to be. If these commercials work as a loophole into a 501.c style endorsement (I noticed no one is saying "I've approved this message" at the end), they're not working.
Not only do I not feel strongly about either of these candidates, I'd prefer my judges to follow the law, not to serve as activists. I'd be more impressed if one of these commercials simply said, "Hi, I'm Judge Blah-blah-blah. I've been a judge for 20 years, and I have a record of ruling consistently with the state's laws, whether I agree with them or not."
And until that, I object. Unless these obscure campaigns change their tactics, I'm not voting for anyone for that position come April.
|
5 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
|
Wednesday When I was a little kid, I regularly ate lunch at a place called JA's Café in a strip ... |
|
Monday For a band that, despite periodic breakups, has maintained a tight and unique sound since ... |
|
Monday Of course, I've been to the Palomino for dinner, drinks and Packers games about a zillion ... |
|
April 30, 2008 Exactly eight weeks ago, to the day, I dropped off my new 2008 BMW 328xi Coupe at Charles ... |
|
April 29, 2008 It's taken nearly three years of driving our 2005 Toyota Prius, but yesterday I refueled ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |