![]() | Lighty99: or will they become hawks again as soon as there's another Republican President? about 13 minutes ago |
![]() | impatientpriest: @WORLD_Magazine Turns out God is not a [large print] Democrat or a [small print] Republican. Hope to see and buy that bumper sticker soon. about 21 minutes ago |
![]() |
Like the taste of cool, refreshing water? Expect to pay the city more for it. |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published July 24, 2009 at 11:23 a.m. |
|
The city is looking at raising water rates as a way to put more money in its general fund, going beyond the traditional water bills being used to cover the cost of running the Water Works. Water Works and city administration officials are looking to raise rates an additional 6.5 percent for suburban users of Milwaukee water and 5 percent for city residents on top of a 3 percent increase that takes effect soon.
The extra money would allow the city to put an additional $3 million a year into the general fund and put $3 million a year into the city's budget.
The Common Council's Public Works Committee approved the request this week and it goes to the full Council next week. The state Public Service Commission would have to sign off on the increase.
"I wish there was another way to generate some revenue," said committee member Ald. Robert Puente, a sentiment echoed by his colleagues on the panel.
"I feel like we're chasing the rabbit down the hole," offered Ald. Joe Dudzik, suggesting that sooner or later residents and business may think twice about staying in the city.
Policing Politics: Milwaukee Ald. Bob Donovan is taking exception to a fundraising ploy by Mayor Tom Barrett to have police Chief Ed Flynn as the main attraction at the $100 a head party next week at the Italian Community Center..
"I'll be honest Tom, this whole thing just doesn't smell right to me," Donovan wrote.
The alderman says it steers away from the city's long-standing tradition of keeping politics out of policing, since the mayor is using the chief as campaign fund bait while the council has to consider cutting police and fire services.
Donovan suggests the mayor donate the money he raises from the event to Operation Impact, a crime-fighting program that happens to be in Donovan's South Side district.
"I think this would be a win-win-win for everybody involved," he wrote.
Loony Tune: It would be a felony to harass animals with motor vehicles and boats, under a law proposed by state Rep. Andy Jorgensen (D-Fort Atkinson). Current laws apparently don't cover threatening or killing wild animals using motor vehicles and boats.
Couple questions: How would the animal complain it was harassed? And isn't the shear presence of vehicles driving down the highway enough to harass any animal? And what would happen to those who run over deer or a boat gets too close to a loon and sets it off squawking?
The crime would carry a penalty of up to three and a half years probation or prison, a $10,000 fine and a mental health assessment. Those who commit such crimes using snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, motorboats or personal watercraft could have their registrations suspended or permanently revoked.
Business Conspiracy: State Rep. Robin Vos sees conspiracy in a new business group that happens to back Gov. Jim Doyle. Vos, a Republican from Caledonia, thinks all business groups should have opposed the governor's budget since it contained $3 billion in new taxes.
"The Wisconsin Business Council is obviously a front group for Gov. Doyle," said Vos, ranking Assembly Republican on the Joint Finance Committee. He says the group was organized by key Doyle insiders, has offered access to Doyle and top Democrats in exchange for corporate contributions to the group. "It's the Jim Doyle diners club," he said.
The club was organized by former Doyle administration chief Marc Marotta. But it also includes powerhouse fund-raiser Phil Prange, a former honcho with the Tommy Thompson machine.
Newt Attack: Newt Gingrich drew 800 people to a fundraiser for County Executive Scott Walker's campaign for governor. Walker also announced that Michael Grebe will be his campaign chairman. Grebe is currently president and CEO of the quite conservative Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation in Milwaukee.
That puts two of the most prominent Republicans pitted against each other next year's election. Walker's opponent is former Congressman Mark Neumann and his top honcho is former Tommy Thompson henchman and fixer Jim Klauser.
|
6 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by mikey k on July 24, 2009 at 5:58 p.m. (report)
If the City needs money then let's make pot legal and tax the hell out of it. I don't smoke pot and don't plan too but it is being smoked all the time so let's make some money on taxing it. Your never going to stop people from burning one.
| Rate this: |
Posted by _Ken_ on July 24, 2009 at 3:41 p.m. (report)
The first part of my comment was directed at the first comment, which clearly showed outrage at having to pay for water. I understand nobody likes taxes being raised, but you have to pick your battles. Nobody's going to move out of the city over a $40 water charge increase. City finances, taxes and services are an interconnected mess. It doesn't surprise me that money from water charges end up elsewhere in the city's coffers, just like it doesn't surprise me that the city can't manage to scrape by while charging people like me $6,000 in property taxes. I would love to see a balanced city budget, but if any of us cared enough about it we'd be running for office and not talking about it here. And attacking someone else's reading comprehension? I think the Internet Tough Guy routine went out of style shortly after the concept of simple, reasonably sized government.
| Rate this: |
Posted by buck on July 24, 2009 at 1:49 p.m. (report)
Ken, work on your reading comprehension. No one is complaining about paying the costs of water delivery and treatment. The problem is that they are jacking up water rates just because these clowns can't control their wasteful spending and balance a budget and they've run out of other ideas to raise taxes and revenue.
| Rate this: |
Posted by sas_tarr on July 24, 2009 at 12:26 p.m. (report)
Well, as long as water charges are used for water cleaning, that's fair and square. But now City of Milwaukee wants to collect through water usage charges money for the budget (see the article)! That means City of Milwaukee wants to throw a new tax on us for some basic needs. Which one would be next? Air tax for breathing the air in Milwaukee? That is sure a long way from public outrage for a tiny tea tax that King George wanted to collect. Isn't it?
| Rate this: |
Posted by _Ken_ on July 24, 2009 at 11:59 a.m. (report)
We've always had to pay for water being cleaned and pumped into our homes. Why wouldn't we? Personally, I think the base charge for water should remain relatively close to the current price and the usage charges should increase dramatically. As it is right now there's little to no incentive to reduce water usage. IIRC, my current charge for water is around $1 per 2,000 gallons of water. At that cost, it's not worth trying to save water. Maybe if the cost was higher people would reconsider doing five loads of laundry during a storm during which millions of gallons of sewage are going to be dumped into the lake.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |