![]() | DanisMadDog: @akhyar98 no, they will implement the president's day-to-day instructions, but any misconduct or authority abuse refers to the commission. about 2 minutes ago |
![]() | LVJobCentral: BRANCH VICE PRESIDENT: BRANCH VICE PRESIDENT Req. ID 7683
Full or Part Time Full-time Primary Location PA01 Rea.. link about 3 minutes ago |
![]() | All_Swine_Flu: What is easier for obama, fix the economy or cure swine flu with the power of his mind? link about 15 minutes ago |
![]() | stephenrusell: Where Mr. Obama's Afghanistan strategy might lead: This exercise is not worth $1 from our Treasury or one precious ... link about 17 minutes ago |
| quirkygreisha: goodness, martial law in maguindanao! what's next?! kaloka! should we worry, will the president lift it right away or not?! about 37 minutes ago |
| By Andy Tarnoff Publisher E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Andy Tarnoff |
| Published Jan. 10, 2008 at 4:43 p.m. |
|
With presidential primary season heading into full swing, I've been pondering a political theory lately: When it comes to the other party, who should you root for?
I'll explain. Say you're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat. Should you root for the most polarizing candidate in the G.O.P., probably Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee, in the hopes that he gets blown out of the water in the general election? Or, in the event that he should win in November, is it better to stump for a more centrist candidate like Rudy Giuliani or John McCain. That way, you won't find yourself moving to Canada if your party loses.
Similarly, let's say you're a Republican. Do you advocate for Hillary Clinton, a candidate who's loathed by more people than any politician in recent memory? Or, do you play it safe and encourage a Democrat you can live with, perhaps Barack Obama or John Edwards?
It's a tough quandary, really. The easy answer is to declare yourself a patriot and root for the best people for the job, regardless of their political party. But I know Democrats who would sooner emigrate to Australia than see another Republican in office. And I know Republicans who will similarly renounce their citizenship if Clinton takes the top prize.
Maybe it comes down to how passionate you are about your favorite candidate, and if you could handle a term (or two) from the other side of the aisle -- and how far you're willing to go to ensure it. In Michigan, for example, the primary is open, which means mischievous Democrats could technically usher in an unwinnable candidate like Fred Thompson, or Republicans could send some delegates the way of Dennis Kucinich.
Don't laugh, it's happened before. In 1972, Republicans voted for segregationist Democrat George Wallace. In 1988, they helped Jesse Jackson win the state. And in '98, they even helped Jack Kevorkian's lawyer win the Democratic primary for governor, assuring the state stayed Republican.
On the other side, the liberal blog, the Daily Kos, is advocating for Democrats to help Romney win Michigan, using the slogan "Democrats for Mitt: Because the GOP Deserves The Very Worst."
Maybe it's all just political theater, and the best man or woman will win, anyway.
But primaries and the electoral college are weird machines. It doesn't take all the much, as history has shown, to throw a monkey wrench into their works. I know that I, for one, will be watching this all unfold with gradually increasing interest and scrutiny.
|
7 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by RJ on Jan. 17, 2008 at 9:12 p.m. (report)
Goodness gracious, if Democrats can live with Reagan and Dubya--and they have done so, grudgingly--, then Republicans "can live with" Obama or Edwards.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on Jan. 11, 2008 at 10:50 a.m. (report)
Republicans move to Canada? No, only democrats threaten to do that and then never follow through. A Republican would rather slit their wrists than live in Canada where you're taxed much higher than you are here...and don't even get me started on their universal healthcare which is a joke.
| Rate this: |
Posted by CoolerKing on Jan. 11, 2008 at 7:17 a.m. (report)
Whoever invests the most into a negative ad campaign, Republican or Democrat, should NOT get the vote.
| Rate this: |
Posted by unfortunately on Jan. 10, 2008 at 6:29 p.m. (report)
Unfortunately, no Republican is going to vacate this country and move to Canada. God forbid they have to live in a socialist country that works! Reasonable health care? Egads!
| Rate this: |
Posted by funhouse on Jan. 10, 2008 at 5:43 p.m. (report)
I think you should just vote for who you believe in. No games, no nonsense. If your candidate doesn't win, at least you voted what you believe.
| Rate this: |
|
Monday Personalized Packers vanity plates aren't cheap. Fortunately, there are ample combination ... |
|
Monday I went to the wedding on Saturday night of one of my wife's best friends. The reception, ... |
|
Nov. 25, 2009 The Web is buzzing about an offensive and crude Photoshopping of Michelle Obama that, ... |
|
Nov. 23, 2009 There's something about the online bargain that has me hooked. Whether it's eBay, Craigslist ... |
|
Nov. 18, 2009 Since starting OnMilwaukee.com in 1998, life has gone increasingly digital. And even within ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |