![]() | stunetii: #Zimbabwe: Some 5,000 ppl were tortured or beaten during 2008 #elections (HRW). #Africa #humanrights about 4 days ago |
| By Molly Snyder Edler OnMilwaukee.com Staff Writer Photography by Zach Karpinski E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Molly Snyder Edler |
| Published Nov. 6, 2007 at 5:44 a.m. |
|
| Subscribe to OnMilwaukee.com Podcasts |
(page 2)
MD: It's hard sometimes, but the benefit of this district is the people who live near the lake are not people who think differently -- they may have different means or bigger houses or more money -- but as far as ideology and thought, the district is pretty progressive from end to end. People understand that problems need long-term solutions, the things that I spoke about before -- home ownership, education and good jobs -- are things we need to work on.
There really isn't a pitting of one side against the other. I was knocking on doors the other day, and we did a ward on Marietta and Lake Drive and Shepherd, and then we did a ward up near Holton Street, and it's amazing to see the difference in the lifestyle, but the people are concerned about the same things: crime, education and making sure they get the biggest bang for their tax dollar.
OMC: As an alderman, is there really anything you can do to improve crime?
MD: I think this is a great question that you ask. I think that when crime's bad, elected officials get too much of the blame, and when crime's down, we get too much of the credit. A lot of it has to do with forces that are out of our control, but I'm one of those people who do not believe that the police department is the only solution for crime.
We have a ton of city departments that need to fight crime. The Health Department has to make people healthy, we need to lower the infant mortality rate. We need to get people off of their addictions. That fights crime. Our Department of City Development needs to help businesses create jobs. That fights crime. Our libraries need to stay open, so the kids have an alternative, a place to go to get off the streets.
Everybody has a role in fighting crime, and when we just put money into cops, we diminish the amount of resources we give to everyone else, and so you're using the most resources on the most expensive solution.
OMC: Do you think crime is getting worse in Riverwest?
MD: There has been a spike in crime in Riverwest over the last year. It's not a dramatic increase, but we're seeing more gun crime. If I were able to do one thing crime-wise, I would get every gun off the street. The kinds of crimes we're seeing were never committed with guns in the past. Like if someone were going to mug someone, they would do it with their hands, now they're carrying a gun. And that's the stuff that scares me. If one thing goes wrong with a gun crime, someone's dead. If something goes wrong with a mugging (in the past) you may have a black eye or a bloody nose, but you weren't dead. We need to get guns off the street.
OMC: Do you think the new Alterra will have a strong positive impact on Riverwest?
MD: I think it's great for Riverwest. The building it replaced was a blight, and it wasn't contributing to the neighborhood. Secondly, they're bringing their whole operation here, and are creating jobs. That's wonderful for the neighborhood. And Alterra has a history of hiring people from the neighborhood already. And it's going to be a gathering spot. It's a really valuable marriage between private sector and public sector. Alterra is a company with a community conscience, so what they do makes them money but it's also really good for the neighborhood.
OMC: What are your thoughts on the development of the river trails?
MD: The trails are fantastic. I have supported the trails. We got money from the state to build the East Bank Trail. We helped get money from the state to build the West Bank Trail. There needs to be a very distinct difference between the hard scape of the river that ends around the Humboldt Bridge and the soft scape that begins above the dam. I think access is incredibly important, and I will point to another success that I think we had.
When I was first elected, one of the emphases I had, was to make the opening of the Oak Leaf Trail -- the bike trail -- accessible from multiple points. And we've done that. We provided an access ramp from North Avenue, we provided a ramp at the Kenilworth building that provides access, we will provide a ramp at the Layfettee Park condominiums that will provide access. The Brady Street Bridge now provides access, and I think we're going to do the same thing at Cambridge Woods.
Those access points have made the trail far more utilized and much safer because more people use it now. The same is true with the river. I think that you can have access without necessarily interrupting the natural state of the river. That's the delicate part of figuring this out. We want to preserve it, but keep it accessible and safe in an area that is urban.
OMC: Some homeowners living east of the river struggle with issues like loud college parties, litter and a lack of parking. What is your message to these residents?
MD: I think that we have to continue to work for solutions and that means the university working with us, the regions working with us, the state working with us because my line is this: UWM has grown its student body 10 percent over the last five years and they never asked anybody who lives around there if that was a good thing. They never measured the impact that it would have on the people who live there, and have made investments there.
It is unfair, I think, for the state to impose that upon us without taking reactions into account. My goal now is to make sure that that connection is between the people who live there and the decision makers, so when they make those kinds of decisions, they understand the impact.
At this point, my belief is that UWM has put as much as they can into that East Side campus. It has reached its maximum growth. It's changing the dynamic of the neighborhood slowly from a single-family neighborhood to a student-rental neighborhood and that's dangerous. It destabilizes that neighborhood. I want the university to be there, it adds value to the area, but I also want the neighborhood to stay family-oriented, and I want that balance to be realized.
The balance is tipping over the wrong way. UWM needs to find a second campus, somewhere in the city, but not on the East Side. Whether it's near Capitol Drive between Humboldt and Holton is a great location, or the old Pabst Brewery, Park East or on the Northeast side. They need another campus that works in conjunction with the East Side campus so they can grown and add value but not overwhelm that neighborhood.
The parking solution that we've come up with for resident parking I think is the perfect model. We didn't say to the university, "Get your cars off our streets. It's your problem." Instead, we said let's make a deal that we understand that the number of spaces that you have for parking are constant -- both on campus and off campus – so we'll trade you those off-campus parking spots on the street, for a new parking structure that you build on campus. This way, the students and the residents win.
<< Back
Page 2 of 3 (view all on one page)Next >>
|
12 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by Prospectrez on Nov. 9, 2007 at 9:01 p.m. (report)
The alderman talks about all the parking restrictions by UWM and how theyre fair but what about the rest of the eastside? You can park anywhere!! Its very hard to be a resident who has to DRIVE to work and when he complains to his alderman about the restrictions and the $1,000s in parking tickets he has accumulated over the years and he says take a bus then. Well, I am all for mass transit and light rail, but we dont have those systems yet and thanks to a state legislature that keeps dragging their heels on the issue, we probably wont for a long time! So the alderman needs to get it through his thick head that residents cannot continue the constant harassment they receive from parking maids because each month it seems that the legal parking times get lower and lower!!!
| Rate this: |
Posted by a_noid on Nov. 8, 2007 at 11:22 a.m. (report)
Farwell and Prospect are main thoroughfares of the east side. Similar to the main arteries that feed the Chicago's loop from I94. In Chicago the main arteries are one way to keep the flow of people moving and keep areas attractive. I lived on Prospect for a while and loved it, it would have been less enjoyable if my commute was an extra 10 minutes everyday due to turn lanes and cross traffic. The two way portion of Farwell should be extended down to Ma Fischers. Two way traffic through that area would help the small businesses on those 3-4 blocks and enliven the intersection of North and Farwell. "They" should then replace the parking lot across from Blockbuster with a new building with retail and student housing and the biggest below ground parking garage that man has ever seen. (I wish I was a developer with connections)
| Rate this: |
Posted by techmafia on Nov. 7, 2007 at 5:53 p.m. (report)
Turning either street into two-way is atrocious! It's obvious there's enough car and foot traffic to support the local businesses as it is. If either got turned we'd have problems with congestions because both streets are pretty much a highway into and out of the east side. Not to mention it would mess with the bus routes, the bike routes, and the PARKING! Let alone any hope we have for a guided bus system.
| Rate this: |
Posted by techmafia on Nov. 7, 2007 at 5:44 p.m. (report)
Turning either street to two-way is atrocious! Slower traffic means more congestion. Both act like a highway to get in an out of the East Side for pretty much anyone with a car. Plus it would screw up the bus routes and the bike lanes AND the parking. Plus think of all the condo owners up and down prospect trying to get out, including those in the new buildings going up. Also, if theirs any hope for a connector program, guided buses or light rail, both would need to remain one-way. It's obvious that it already attracts enough car and foot traffic to support the businesses in the area.
| Rate this: |
Posted by east side business owner on Nov. 7, 2007 at 4:58 p.m. (report)
I have not rec'd any "favors" or favorable treatment from D'Amato, but when I have had concerns he has been there to help me address them and as a resource to make my business better. I also have been at neighborhood meetings and development meetings where there has been an uproar over nothing (people resisting change) and D'Amato has listened to everyone, presented his opinion eloquently and thoughtfully, and when the time came for a consensus and a vote the majority of people have changed their mind and gone with what probably was truly better for the situation and not with where all the bitchin' was coming from. I think he is intelligent and professional and truly cares about all the people and businesses in his district. Term limits are for people who don't want the best candidate to win just because he was the best candidate previously also. That doesn't make sense. Good job D'Amato, keep up the hard work, your district is better because of it.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |