![]() | bellaleelee: @RachelSomething hahaha! NARNIA OVER! now is some.. crime thingy? smuggling humans or smth. hahaha about 4 minutes ago |
![]() | BillHewgley: #Legal- Aid and Abet- "Help, assist, or facilitate the commission of a crime,"... Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed about 18 minutes ago |
![]() | Dannyhackett: @ReeceKidman well that's a shame :( u commiting a crime or are you allowed in there :)? about 27 minutes ago |
![]() | joshmyoung: @chloejmoss punish ppl only when they commit a crime, not for meeting together! govt has no place to say who i can meet, when and/or how about 3 hours ago |
![]() | berrygellybelly: @skipdancing YOU SHOULD'VE BROUGHT ME ;O; OR PICTURES. IT IS A CRIME NOT TO TAKE PICTURES HURR! about 4 hours ago |
| By OnMilwaukee.com Staff Writers |
| Published July 28, 2007 at 6:36 a.m. |
|
In late June, Mayor Barrett signed the gang loitering ordinance, the same ordinance he threatened to veto last year. He waited until the last-minute before signing the measure the same day Summerfest began its 11-day run.
Politicians have a bad habit of releasing information or signing bills late on Friday afternoons or, in this case, opening day of the world's largest music festival, when they don't want the media to report it. Instead, Barrett chose to allow his office to keep citizens guessing about his stance until the 5 p.m. signing deadline. This ordinance, whether you supported it or not, was a harbinger of the type of leadership emanating from the mayor's office and his lukewarm, almost apathetic, support spoke volumes.
As Bob Marley sang, "You can fool some people sometimes, but you can't fool all the people all of the time..."
Barrett's continued lack of proactive tactics to address the crime crisis in our city is inexcusable. His flaks can pontificate until they turn blue in the face about having "a plan" and "rolling up his sleeves" but the truth is that crime has not subsided since the day he took office, nor have the safety issues in MPS been challenged. He can appoint all the blue-ribbon crime committees he wants but in order to curb the rise in crime he needs to react before the crimes take place, not after. I believe this lack of vision and foresight is a result of his lack of law enforcement experience, he's a career politician, not a zero tolerance, iron fist when it comes to crime.
Barrett, like me, lives in the City of Milwaukee but I am convinced that he rarely leaves the confines of Downtown to truly see crime where it happens. Fortunately, violent crime Downtown is rare but it's happening in many other places and Barrett needs to be the daily icon in the fight against crime instead of the afterthought. How could former New York Mayor Giuliani drastically reduce crime in New York yet Barrett can't do the same in a city with a fraction of the population and the high-crime area confined to a defined section of Milwaukee.
What's even more sad is that Mayor Barrett appears to be getting a free pass into serving another four years. As of today there are no announced candidates to take on the current mayor in the April 2008 election. Prominent names on the short list of potential candidates include Common Council President Willie Hines, Congresswoman Gwen Moore, WHEDA Executive Director Antonio Riley and Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke.
Hines has shown exemplary leadership at times and could well further that as mayor. He has a great rapport and respect with his constituents as well as those outside of his district. Riley undoubtedly also has salient experience as head of WHEDA addressing the issues of central city residents.
While she grew up in Milwaukee's central city, Moore has been largely off the Milwaukee scene while in Washington D.C. She has, instead, chosen to protest the United States' lack of action in Sudan (Darfur) and telling companies like BuySeasons that their jobs aren't good enough for central city Milwaukeeans, allowing those jobs to go to back to the suburbs. That's not exactly the type of leadership needed by Milwaukeeans. Unfortunately, none of the above, except for Clarke, has any direct law enforcement experience which I believe is needed to begin to reverse the current trends in our central city.
Barrett seems to enjoy appearing at press conferences where he can puff out his chest with other bureaucrats in offering shallow promises while the victims of crimes continue to sit on the sidelines and ask why.
Our city deserves a leader who can create and manage change. Our city deserves good, proactive leadership that's also tough on crime.
|
28 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by Beeswax on Sept. 18, 2007 at 12:35 p.m. (report)
Wauwatosa - Those that complain are usually the ones that do nothing. Instead of complaining about what's being done, (or for that matter, offering suggestions that are not reasonably able to be accomplished) why not run for office yourself? Criticizing only goes so far, especially when there are other people out there trying to do something.
| Rate this: |
Posted by ChateauDweller on Aug. 3, 2007 at 9:20 a.m. (report)
I'm not 100% on this, but I believe that Clarke signed away his pension benefit during his first sheriff election. That was when the pension scandal broke and he didn't want to be associated with it. I do believe that his opponent refused to do the same.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on Aug. 2, 2007 at 9:29 a.m. (report)
Once again you're WRONG! Do your friggin homework! Clarke is NOT eligible for any of the huge pension kickbacks that Ament and others received. He didn't start as Sheriff in time to receive the huge pension backdrop. Call his office or the county pension board and find out for yourself! Clarke won't run, he can't compete with the huge amount of liberal money already in Barrett's coffers.
| Rate this: |
Posted by wauwatosa on Aug. 1, 2007 at 7:17 p.m. (report)
I contacted Chris Haworth and got the following reply: First and foremost, thank you for reading my column. It's always fun to hear from people who actually read it outside of my mom. :) To answer your question, I am not paid by Sheriff Clarke in any fashion. I do, however, consider him a friend. I was compensated during his most recent campaign for Sheriff but trust me, it didn't even cover my gas costs for running around and planting yard signs in my free time. I am a supporter and am happy to volunteer my time in some capacity for his campaigns, etc. I have never worked for him or any other candidate in a full-time capacity, always on the side as I have a regular 9-5 day job. Does that answer your question? I felt it important to include that disclaimer in the article even though I am not currently paid by the Sheriff and whatever compensation I received during the campaign was quite minimal. It's best to have full disclosure in these situations. Let me know if you need anything else. Respectfully, Chris PS - please keep reading and sending talkbacks! It's great to see the dialogue pro and con! Now, there's a nice respectful reply. Now you know, he was paid a stipend but mostly volunteers. I hope that settles the question. As for Clarke, I welcome his entry into the race in 2008, if not i'm sure he'll be kickin' back in the Sheriff's office chomping at the bit to get his hands on the big, fat pensions he's going to receive from both MPD and the County. There's a good conservative for you, say one thing, collect tax dollars to line his pockets with the other.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on Aug. 1, 2007 at 4:37 p.m. (report)
No, I think a lot of people give free advice...it doesn't always have to be paid. And you're wrong again, Clarke would NOT have to give up his post to run for Mayor. In my honest opinion, Clarke will not run for Mayor because he's already 600k in the hole to Barrett...almost impossible to make up that lost ground. That's a lot of scratch! I guess I'm stuck with "Mayor Barrett" for the rest of my adult life. "Saturation patrols" is a mild alternative to what I would do. It would work even better if it was done fully...and like I said earlier, you can't gauge success only after a couple of months...you need to see year to year stats and trends.
| Rate this: |
|
Nov. 21, 2009 Mason Jennings made a stop Friday night at Turner Hall Ballroom. |
|
Nov. 20, 2009 For Rock and Roll Hall of Fame singer John Fogerty, the world of music -- whether it be ... |
|
The Milwaukee Holiday Parade steps off Saturday Nov. 19, 2009 The Milwaukee Holiday Parade -- now in its 83rd year -- begins at 9:30 a.m. Saturday, ... |
|
Live Blog Recap: Bucks vs. New Jersey Nov. 18, 2009 The Bucks continued their winning ways tonight with a 99-85 victory over New Jersey Wednesday ... |
|
Present music serves up musical feast Nov. 17, 2009 Get ready for Thanksgiving and the holidays with Present Music's Sunday night concert. |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |