![]() | HomeownerTips: Top 10 Tips to Escape Mold Problems in Buying or Selling a House ... link about 7 minutes ago |
![]() | Star_of_MY_show: How important is s-e-x in a relationship, is it #1, top 5, 10 or lower & y?? about 2 hours ago |
![]() | dbq: chicken or egg? i'm 50% sure is teh cheekin! lolz - Top 10 Arguments That Can’t Be Won link about 3 hours ago |
![]() | seanmaxx: Up & at 'em as they say. Here goes nothing! "Gimme sympathy, who would you rather be the beatles or the rolling stones". about 3 hours ago |
![]() | aaambberrr: @David_Henrie I got another one of them impossible questions for yah..the beatles or the rolling stones? about 3 hours ago |
| By Bobby Tanzilo Managing Editor E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Bobby Tanzilo |
| Published Sept. 26, 2007 at 3:34 p.m. |
|
With apologies to Nick Hornby, I'm not much of a list-maker anymore. Sure, I was the music geek kid with a list -- and a ready-made mix tape -- for every eventuality, but now I love music more than I enjoy trying to quantify it.
But every year I vote in the Village Voice's Pazz & Jop music critics poll and while starting to think about this year's top 10, I got to thinking about an all time top 10.
It's impossible, but I'm going to try to assemble one here. It will be a work in progress, as it's been for the past 32 years or so of my music jones. Yes, my first job coincided with my newfound love for music at age 9 when I took a part-time job watching for shoplifters at a neighborhood record shop (two LPs a week pay; double albums count as one!).
This is not a list of my current favorite top 10 records, but an attempt to get to the nitty gritty of all time (and I won't put them in order; that is No. 1 is not necessarily better than No. 2, etc.). And to prevent further complication, I'm going to save jazz for another list. Wish me luck...
Here's a first stab. But I'm already missing some records that I've worn practically through. I think this early draft reflects a bit of deference to traditional ideas of the best rock era records.
Maybe I'm afraid to include Placebo's "Without You I'm Nothing" at the expense of "Sticky Fingers" or Augustus Pablo's "Original Rockers" instead of "Highway 61" for fear of looking like a heathen. Not that I'd really mind that. Maybe 10 just isn't enough.
I'll revist the list next week and make changes.
1) Bob Marley & the Wailers -- Survival
2) The Beatles -- Revolver (original UK version, which was chopped nearly in half in the US)
3) The Rolling Stones -- Sticky Fingers (Let It Bleed is tempting, but Charlie Watts is better represented here)
4) The Clash (I'm partial to the American version of the green album, but I'll allow it to share this space with the "real" UK version, which was the original earth-shaker)
5) Sex Pistols -- Never Mind the Bollocks
6) Bob Dylan -- Highway 61 Revisited
7) Funkadelic -- America Eats Its Young
8) Elvis Costello -- My Aim is True
9) Gang of Four -- Entertainment
10) Marvin Gaye -- What's Going On
Simmering:
Placebo -- Without You I'm Nothing
The Jam -- Sound Affects
Augustus Pablo -- Original Rockers
The Specials
Television -- Marquee Moon
Son Volt -- Trace
The Smiths -- Hatful of Hollow (which I'd include even though it wasn't conceived as a "proper" album; it wasn't a greatest hits, though, either)
Use the Talkback feature below to share your thoughts or to remind of what a futile exercise this really is!
|
4 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by Racilla.Killah on Sept. 27, 2007 at 10:52 p.m. (report)
littletinyfish - The beatles and the stones and dylan are "always on these lists" because THEY'RE THE BEST. Why leave the greatest off the lists just to be interesting. About the list... I'd go with Sgt. Pepper's or The White Album over Revolver.. id' go with Exile on Main St. or Let It Bleed over STicky Fingas And I'd go with Blonde on Blonde over any dylan record, or any record in general. I'd also go with London Calling over their first record... I'd prolly throw the Libertines "up the bracket" and some Otis Redding or James Brown at the Apollo... I dunno... It's way too hard to narrow this down.. Good list though
| Rate this: |
Posted by littletinyfish on Sept. 27, 2007 at 10:17 a.m. (report)
I find it hard to compile the "Best of" lists because it's hard to reconcile what you like with what is truly good. Were the Beatles good? Maybe, but they certainly hold no meaningful value these days, with their over saturation in every possible market. "She loves you blah blah blah." I also think these lists become boring because The Beatles are always there. The Stones are always there. Dylan is always there...and from there it's always a rotating cast of about 20 bands, interchanged based on only a slight variation of taste. In your list, the bands I most cared about were the ones you left simmering. I want THAT story. I would change this list from "The Best" to "The Most Meaningful." I'm not gonna argue whether or not The Stones have contributed positively to the music scene, but I can say The Weakerthans' "Reconstruction Site" album came at an excellent time for me.
| Rate this: |
Posted by sandstorm on Sept. 27, 2007 at 10:02 a.m. (report)
gang of four! great, great record!!!
| Rate this: |
Posted by Daniel on Sept. 26, 2007 at 4:28 p.m. (report)
"I think this early draft reflects a bit of deference to traditional ideas of the best rock era records." Ah, ya think?! :)
| Rate this: |
|
Tuesday In 2006, Peter Jest convinced the band to do a reunion gig at Shank Hall. Now, the band ... |
|
Monday The 40th anniversary box set of "Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out!: The Rolling Stones in Concert" ... |
|
Oct. 28, 2009 Milwaukee County annouced today that September was the busiest month ever at Mitchell ... |
|
Oct. 27, 2009 Although it has changed a bit over the years -- especially notable was the addition of ... |
|
Open Table salutes Il Mito and Ristorante Bartolotta Oct. 26, 2009 Tosa takes the cake. Well, at least two Italian restaurants in Wauwatosa are the only ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |