| By Andy Tarnoff Publisher E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Andy Tarnoff |
| Published Jan. 25, 2008 at 11:37 a.m. |
|
When I first heard about Wikipedia, I was the ultimate doubter. Why would I trust the ramblings of amateur Web surfers over those of professional encyclopedia authors? But as I delved further into the phenomenon, I realized that more often than not, the content is accurate, vetted time and time again until the truth surfaces. And even when it's not perfect, it's a great starting point to knowledge.
My favorite part of Wikipedia is jumping from article to article, answering questions I didn't even know I had.
And sometimes, when I have a moment to spare, I just click "random article" and see what comes up. Occasionally, I feel like a Renaissance man and know a thing or two about the results. More often, I'm reminded how very little I actually know, and just how big our world is.
For the love of blogging, I sat down this morning and hit "random article" 10 times. Here's what I found:
|
3 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
|
Nov. 24, 2008 I was temporarily taken aback when I got a package from Zhangzhou today. You know, Pantuo. ... |
|
Nov. 24, 2008 We're getting deluged with e-mails asking us about a peculiar new Web site that just popped ... |
|
Nov. 19, 2008 As if trying to sign CC Sabathia wasn't hard enough, it looks like the local paper may ... |
|
Nov. 17, 2008 TDIMH has been a long-time work in progress, culled from many sources by many people. ... |
|
Nov. 16, 2008 It's too bad it's coming at the cost of a global recession, but I just spotted a gallon ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |
|
||||||||||||||||