In Milwaukee Buzz
In Milwaukee Buzz


Two green homes go on the market in Riverwest
Back in spring 2008, Pragmatic Construction, a Milwaukee-based green construction company aimed at advancing the principles of sustainable development within the urban environment, was knee-deep in a series of development projects but was still planning its path for a greener future in Milwaukee.
Co-founder Steve Servais and his crew were just laying out the plans for two single-family homes in Riverwest that were slated to be among the state's first LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified platinum homes.
LEED is a third-party certification
program and the nationally accepted benchmark for the design,
construction and operation of high performance green buildings. LEED points are awarded
in the areas of sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy and
atmosphere, materials and resources, indoor environmental quality and
innovation and design process and use the most advanced design and
construction initiatives available.
LEED-certified buildings are designed to lower operating costs and increase asset value, reduce waste sent to landfills, conserve energy and water, be healthier and safer for occupants and reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions.
Two years later, the side-by-side sustainable homes at 702 and 708 E. Hadley St. are complete and now on the market. Servais says his company has really pushed sustainable building to the limit.
The house sizes are modest; 1,200 and 1,300 square feet, respectively. But the environmental impact is huge. Some of the many green features include passive solar heating, passive cooling, 96 percent energy-efficient forced-air backup HVAC, bio-based sprayfoam roof insulation, triple-pane windows, tankless hot water, reclaimed hardwood flooring, reclaimed doors, steel, fiber-cement and cedar siding, stained concrete flooring, no-VOC paints and finishes, dual-flush toilets and low-flow fixtures, in-floor radiant heat and energy recovery ventilators.
And it doesn't stop indoors. Outside they've implemented rain barrels, a shared rain-garden, pervious paving surfaces, steel roofing, recycled plastic roofing, a 2.1KW PV Array (solar electric), and two flat-panel solar hot water arrays.
The cost of this type of certification does come with a price. Both homes, which include two bedrooms, one and a half bathrooms and an office, are listed at $229,000. Then again, Servais says potential owners should expects monthly utility bills of less than $30.
Servais says a big part of achieving his goal on this project was assistance from Wisconsin's Focus on Energy Renewable Energy program, which helps make renewable energy an attainable option by encouraging Wisconsin residents and businesses to investigate and adopt renewable energy sources. The program offers technical assistance, funding and incentives for site assessments, and maintains active lists of renewable energy contractors. Additional funding was secured through We Energies Renewable Energy Program.
Talkbacks
dpc | Jan. 17, 2010 at 3:03 a.m. (report)
Hi speakthetruth. While the 9,000 square foot mansion you mention is certainly atypical, I still think your post still deserves a thoughtful reply. The house you describe is not operating efficiently, but it has potential to be very green. Retrofitting existing structures is the greenest strategy. No matter how efficiently a new "green" building is heated/cooled, etc. the amount of resources that go into construction inherently makes it less green than retrofitting an old, existing building. With 1 out of every 9 homes in the US currently vacant, it is hard to justify new construction, no matter how "green." And no, I do not work in the public sector. Not sure what you are getting at there.
| Rate this: |
speakthetruth | Jan. 15, 2010 at 4:56 p.m. (report)
Four things: 1) Lucky Charms is right, these buggers are far too pricey. You can get a much better pad in a much nicer neighborhood for that price. 2) DPC: "...the greenest building is the one that's already built" That's completely and utterly ridiculous. So, I have 9,000 square foot turn of the century mansion with single pane glass windows and coal-fired boiler that's 40% efficient. How's that green? Your math skills and logic are both lacking. Do you work in the public sector, by chance? 3) Keeping buildings 63 in the winter makes a lot more sense than keeping them 70 in the summer. You know what makes even more sense? Windows that open, white roof coloring, and heating/cooling the people, not the spaces. 4) How can a house be "green" without any greenery in the yard? These bad boys should have a dozen trees for shade and CO2 remediation.
| Rate this: |
ChateauDweller | Jan. 14, 2010 at 11:17 a.m. (report)
How can you put a price on saving polar bears!? If these houses are anything like my LEED certified office building, the temperature will never be above 63 in the winter, unless you use space heaters.
| Rate this: |
dpc | Jan. 14, 2010 at 9:54 a.m. (report)
These are great, but it's worth reminding ourselves that the greenest building is the one that's already built.
| Rate this: |
Show me the other Talkback
|
6 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review. |
Facebook Comments
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.
Like Us
Follow Us















